Otoacoustic
Emission
An otoacoustic emission (OAE), first discovered by David
Kemp in 1979, is a sound which is generated from within the inner ear by a
number of different cellular mechanisms. OAEs disappears
with inner ear damaged, so OAEs are often used as a measure of inner ear
health.
There are two types of otoacoustic emissions: Spontaneous
Otoacoustic Emissions (SOAEs) and Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (EOAEs).
OAE is considered to be related to the amplification
function of the cochlea. OAEs occur when the cochlear amplifier is too
strong. Possibly outer hair cells enhance cochlear sensitivity and
frequency selectivity and provide the energy. The outer hair cells have few
afferent fibersbut receive extensive efferent innervation, whose activation
decreases cochlear sensitivity and frequency discrimination.

Fig. 1
TEOAE of a healthy ear
EOAEs are currently evoked using two different
methodologies. Transient EOAEs (TEOAE or TrEOAE) are evoked using a click
stimulus that repeat at about 20 instances per second. 98% of the healthy ears have TEOAEs (0.5-4
kHz), but above 60 year only 35%. The evoked response from this type of
stimulus covers the frequency range up to around 4 kHz. Transient potentials
were the original methodology of examination used by Kemp. Distortion Product
OAEs (DPOAE) are evoked using a pair of tones with particular intensity
(usually either 65 - 55 dB or 65 for both) and frequency ratio (F2/F1). The
evoked response from these stimuli occurs at a third frequency. This distortion
product frequency is calculated based on the original F1 and F2. Inner ear
damage diminishes the distortion product.
Middle, inner and
retrocochlear disorders, tinnitus.
Last decade, OAEs became increasingly impoortnat in the clinical
audiological practice. It is still uncertain if there is an interaction, e.g.
at the level of the olivocochlear bundle, between the ears regarding OAEs. In
general, contralateral stimulation does not provoke EOAEs. The frequency
resolution, e.g. for speech, depends on very fast modulation of the incoming
signal. Due to the neural distance, this modulation would lag behind if
otoacoustic emissions in one ear would effect the
opposite one.
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otoacoustic_emission"
Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A
review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991, 89: 2027-67.